could it be possible to have one open orders pool loop for multiple pairs / periods?
one for all orders is better than 12 running simultaneously just for moving stops.
for practicality it would seem to only be needed if there are orders open and while a pc might spread its workload
over multiple cores its not likely unless your pc is low on processor cache but then your saving resources by only
having one order pool loop and not 12. only the historic order pool has anything to do with local resources.
To add comments, please log in or register