Hi all,
Having a bit of trouble with the OOP implementation - I will say this first, I am a noob when it comes to OOP.
I want to define the following array as a global constant:
Clearly, these values are immutable and, when defined using non-OOP MQL4, this is a standard definition for pre-loading an array.
Not a big deal, I can always define a method called in the constructor to load the array - but, this is tedious and as this could be 1 of many pre-defined arrays used by the class, I would write a method to load each array individually? There must be a better, accepted approach.
Hints?
Implementation in MQL is a bit inconvenient.This is what doc reads. I did not try with arrays though.
A static class member can be declared with the const keyword. Such static constants must be initialized at the global level with the const keyword:
//+------------------------------------------------------------------+ //| Class "Stack" for storing processed data | //+------------------------------------------------------------------+ class CStack { public: CStack(void); ~CStack(void){}; ... private: static const int s_max_length; // Maximum stack capacity }; //--- Initialization of the static constant of the CStack class const int CStack::s_max_length=1000;
Far out! Thanks.
public: static const double FibonacciLevels[6]; }; const double CPolyRegression::FibonacciLevels[6]={0.0,23.6,38.2,50.0,61.8,100.0};
Works like a champ!
- Free trading apps
- Over 8,000 signals for copying
- Economic news for exploring financial markets
You agree to website policy and terms of use
Hi all,
Having a bit of trouble with the OOP implementation - I will say this first, I am a noob when it comes to OOP.
I want to define the following array as a global constant:
Clearly, these values are immutable and, when defined using non-OOP MQL4, this is a standard definition for pre-loading an array.
Not a big deal, I can always define a method called in the constructor to load the array - but, this is tedious and as this could be 1 of many pre-defined arrays used by the class, I would write a method to load each array individually? There must be a better, accepted approach.
Hints?