|
/ | Forum |
  |
Shinigami
2007.06.01 14:21
I know I might be digging up old info but I really need it. I didn't find anything
exact about it with search.
There is a way to get 99% quality backtest. It uses tick data. That data is then saved and used instead of "every tick" model of the metatrader strategy tester. Is tick data any better than M1 data, downloaded from internet? Which one shows higher quality of backtest? Its about scalpers. |
 |
Interview with Olexandr Topchylo (Better) Olexandr performed unsuccessfully in the last-year Championship, and this failure was the making of him. He learned his lesson and became the leader of Championship 2007 with a huge equity! |
|
Zap
2007.06.02 12:52
Shinigami wrote:
Contact me at forexzap<at>gmail<dot>com. This info can't be new enough. ;)I know I might be digging up old info but I really need it. I didn't find anything exact about it with search. There is a way to get 99% quality backtest. It uses tick data. That data is then saved and used instead of "every tick" model of the metatrader strategy tester. Is tick data any better than M1 data, downloaded from internet? Which one shows higher quality of backtest? Its about scalpers. |
|
FXIA
2008.01.05 02:38
When downloading data from metaquotes it has not been accurate for about two months
now for me and M1 data does not download at all - it is not available for me. MQ's
need to make sure new version of MT uses tick data, some brokers have it available
for download.
|