| / | Forum |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.15 02:59
Strategy Tester Report
AlpariUK-Demo (Build 226)
I produced this EA and see, as you can see, hardly any losses. I am to make it more successful by adding a variable lot size and both martingale and antimartingale. I don't get from alot of people (that I encounter) that an EA will always make money, so what about these results? Critisism or Comments?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Econometrics EURUSD One-Step-Ahead Forecast The article focuses on one-step-ahead forecasting for EURUSD using EViews software and a further evaluation of forecasting results using the programs in EViews. The forecast involves regression models and is evaluated by means of an Expert Advisor developed for MetaTrader 4. |
|
1005phillip
2010.05.15 03:23
I'll just quote myself from the last time you posted this exact same backtest: http://forum.mql4.com/31751#315337 You have a 31% drawdown but appear to have taken no losses...that means your MAE is quite significant (and relevant) as your strategy keeps large floating losses positions waiting out the market in hopes that it can eventually close for profit. This type of strategy has known outcome when tested on live markets. |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.15 03:39
1005phillip wrote >>
I'll just quote myself from the last time you posted this exact same backtest: http://forum.mql4.com/31751#315337 You have a 31% drawdown but appear to have taken no losses...that means your MAE is quite significant (and relevant) as your strategy keeps large floating losses positions waiting out the market in hopes that it can eventually close for profit. This type of strategy has known outcome when tested on live markets.
I am just trying to figure out the figures.. Z for a trading system is calculated by the following formula:
So, if I try to figure out N thinking this should be "Total Trades", then I try to figure out R and this in tern gives same? |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.15 04:05
Subgenius wrote >>
I am just trying to figure out the figures.. Z for a trading system is calculated by the following formula:
So, if I try to figure out N thinking this should be "Total Trades", then I try to figure out R and this in tern gives same?
Am I correct in stating the z-score as follows: Z = (810*(3-0.5)-12832)/((12832*(12832-810))/(810-1))^(1/2) Check me if I 'm wrong. Link: http://www.forextraders.com/forex-strategy/using-the-z-score-to-determine-trade-size.html |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.15 05:02
1005phillip wrote >>
I'll just quote myself from the last time you posted this exact same backtest: http://forum.mql4.com/31751#315337 You have a 31% drawdown but appear to have taken no losses...that means your MAE is quite significant (and relevant) as your strategy keeps large floating losses positions waiting out the market in hopes that it can eventually close for profit. This type of strategy has known outcome when tested on live markets.
Z = - 0.001992546 Comments? |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.15 05:22
Subgenius wrote >>
Z = - 0.001992546 Comments? I am not sure this is correct, and I was given a different answer for it here: Either way your probably right. |
|
Subgenius
2010.05.16 12:10
All trades close same day.. Incidentally I was missing some chart data which incurred losses, oh and my money management is installed now so I will make an update on how it does. |